Some of HTC's Google patents may be worthless
That's according to Tyron Stading, founder and chief technology officer of Innography, a software company that pores through data related to intellectual property. His company's analysis found that Google may not have had the right to sell two of the nine patents.
At issue were missing signatures from the original inventors of patents bought from Palm and Motorola. In both cases,wholesales mac Lip gloss inventors didn't assign the technology to the company, meaning they weren't in the position to sell the patents. Stading said that in past instances where this has happened, the court will throw out a case if the plaintiff doesn't prove proper ownership of the patents.
"This could have been avoided had they done the proper due diligence,2012 nfl super bowl jerseys" Stading said. "This causes a huge issue for strategic defense."
Representatives for HTC and Google weren't immediately available for comment.
HTC had counted on these patents in its legal counterattack against Apple. Last week, the company filed a new lawsuit in the federal district court in Delaware and amended its complaint with the International Trade Commission to incorporate the new intellectual property.cleveland cavaliers jerseys
For Google, it represented the first direct support of one of an Android partner. Several companies, including HTC, Samsung Electronics, and Motorola Mobility, had been targets of lawsuits by Apple. In response, Google bought Motorola and its 17,000 patents (with 7,500 pending).
Stading said that all of the parties have been Cheap Christian Louboutinnotified of the ownership issues with the two patents. He said he wouldn't disclose if Innography was working with either side.
If the patents are found to be invalid, there's little HTC can do about it. The company would have to re-file its case using the other seven patents. Google and HTC also can't retroactively get the inventors' signatures.
That's according to Tyron Stading, founder and chief technology officer of Innography, a software company that pores through data related to intellectual property. His company's analysis found that Google may not have had the right to sell two of the nine patents.
At issue were missing signatures from the original inventors of patents bought from Palm and Motorola. In both cases,wholesales mac Lip gloss inventors didn't assign the technology to the company, meaning they weren't in the position to sell the patents. Stading said that in past instances where this has happened, the court will throw out a case if the plaintiff doesn't prove proper ownership of the patents.
"This could have been avoided had they done the proper due diligence,2012 nfl super bowl jerseys" Stading said. "This causes a huge issue for strategic defense."
Representatives for HTC and Google weren't immediately available for comment.
HTC had counted on these patents in its legal counterattack against Apple. Last week, the company filed a new lawsuit in the federal district court in Delaware and amended its complaint with the International Trade Commission to incorporate the new intellectual property.cleveland cavaliers jerseys
For Google, it represented the first direct support of one of an Android partner. Several companies, including HTC, Samsung Electronics, and Motorola Mobility, had been targets of lawsuits by Apple. In response, Google bought Motorola and its 17,000 patents (with 7,500 pending).
Stading said that all of the parties have been Cheap Christian Louboutinnotified of the ownership issues with the two patents. He said he wouldn't disclose if Innography was working with either side.
If the patents are found to be invalid, there's little HTC can do about it. The company would have to re-file its case using the other seven patents. Google and HTC also can't retroactively get the inventors' signatures.